Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Manhattan Scenic Studios, Inc. v. Fields

Manhattan Scenic Studios, Inc. v. Fields

145 N.Y.S. 1024
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedFebruary 13, 1914
StatusPublished

This text of 145 N.Y.S. 1024 (Manhattan Scenic Studios, Inc. v. Fields) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manhattan Scenic Studios, Inc. v. Fields, 145 N.Y.S. 1024 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[1, 2] The return day of the summons was September 17, 1913. The date to which the case was adjourned was February 21, 1914. Section 194 of the Municipal Court Act (Laws 1902, c. 580) prohibits an adjournment without consent for a period exceeding 90 days from the return of the summons. Conlan v. Murray (Sup.) 92 N. Y. Supp. 58. The order was unauthorized, but is not one from which an appeal is authorized to this court (sections 253-257, Mun. Ct. Act), and is therefore not appealable. Spiegelman v. Union Ry. Co., 95 App. Div. 92, 88 N. Y. Supp. 478.

Appeal dismissed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spiegelman v. Union Railway Co.
95 A.D. 92 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)
Conlan v. Murry
92 N.Y.S. 58 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 N.Y.S. 1024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manhattan-scenic-studios-inc-v-fields-nyappterm-1914.