Manhattan Savings Bank v. Farrell
This text of 268 A.D. 981 (Manhattan Savings Bank v. Farrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Taking into consideration the evidence of all pertinent factors as adduced before the official referee, we find that the fair and reasonable market value of the premises as of the date of sale was $60,000. The Special Term accordingly was warranted in denying the motion for a deficiency judgment. The order so far as appealed from, should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.
Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur.
Order so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 A.D. 981, 51 N.Y.S.2d 939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manhattan-savings-bank-v-farrell-nyappdiv-1944.