Manhattan Ry. Co. v. Youmans

30 N.Y.S. 566, 81 Hun 82, 88 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 82, 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 562
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 12, 1894·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PEE CUBIAM.

The judgment entered in this action appointing the commissioners having adjudged that the plaintiff was en[567] titled to recover the costs of the trial, to be taxed by the clerk, left no discretion in the clerk as to whether costs were properly allowable or not. Costs having been awarded by the court, there is no power to review and reverse this judgment upon a taxation of costs. If the parties are of the opinion that because of the stipulation they should not be charged with costs, their only remedy is either a motion to correct the judgment, and an appeal from the order denying such motion, if it is denied, or by an appeal from the judgment. As long as the judgment stands directing the taxation of costs, under which the taxing officer acts, there seems to be no power to review such action, and set it aside, because of reason- which can in no respect affect his action. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manhattan Ry. Co. v. Youmans, 30 N.Y.S. 566, 81 Hun 82, 88 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 82, 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 562 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

30 N.Y.S. 566 (Manhattan Ry. Co. v. Youmans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LaRosa v. Wilner
54 Misc. 574 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)