Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United States
This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 745 (Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The proper basis for dutiable.purposes of certain radios or radio sets covered by the appeal for a reappraisement in the above case is before the court for determination.
The parties hereto have entered into a stipulation of fact wherein it has been agreed as follows:
IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court:
1. That the merchandise covered by the above appeals for reap-praisement consists of radios or radio sets exported from Japan on or about August 6,1960 (Vessel: Tomishima Maru).
2. That radios or radio sets are not listed in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958; and, that the said merchandise was entered for consumption subsequent to February 27,1958.
3. That on or about the date of exportation of the said merchandise, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold, or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, [746]*746packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the appraised value, less the buying commission, as stated on the invoices.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the above appeal for reappraisement may be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.
Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis of value and that said value is the appraised value, less buying commission, as stated on the invoice.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 Cust. Ct. 745, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manhattan-novelty-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1968.