Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United States

56 Cust. Ct. 590, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2059

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 12, 1966

DocketReap. Dec. 11123

StatusPublished

This text of 56 Cust. Ct. 590 (Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United States, 56 Cust. Ct. 590, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2059 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

OliveR, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the above appeal for reappraisement consists of guitars exported from Japan subsequent to February 27, 1958.

That guitars are not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958; and that the said merchandise was entered for consumption subsequent to February 27, 1958.

That on or about the date of exportation of the said merchandise, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold, or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for [591]*591exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the appraised value, less the buying commission, as stated on the invoice.

IT IS FURTHER STIPUUATED AND AGREED that the above appeal for reappraisement may be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

The stipulated facts establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise, as hereinabove identified, is export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, and that such statutory value is the appraised value, less the buying commission, as stated on the invoice.

As to all other merchandise included on the invoice covered by the entry involved herein, the appeal for reappraisement is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OliveR, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the above appeal for reappraisement consists of guitars exported from Japan subsequent to February 27, 1958.

That guitars are not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958; and that the said merchandise was entered for consumption subsequent to February 27, 1958.

That on or about the date of exportation of the said merchandise, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold, or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for [591]*591exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the appraised value, less the buying commission, as stated on the invoice.

IT IS FURTHER STIPUUATED AND AGREED that the above appeal for reappraisement may be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

The stipulated facts establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise, as hereinabove identified, is export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, and that such statutory value is the appraised value, less the buying commission, as stated on the invoice.

As to all other merchandise included on the invoice covered by the entry involved herein, the appeal for reappraisement is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 Cust. Ct. 590, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manhattan-novelty-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1966.