Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 261

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 32 Cust. Ct. 459 →

United States Customs Court·Decided January 13, 1955·No. No. 58688; protest 239481-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of John P. Herber & Co., Inc. v. United States (30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited case, the protest was dismissed, and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of John P. Herber & Co., Inc. v. United States (30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited case, the protest was dismissed, and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).

Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 261 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

34 Cust. Ct. 261 (Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related