Manhattan Life Insurance Co. v. Harkrider
402 S.W.2d 511, 9 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 341, 1966 Tex. LEXIS 321
Opinion
The burden of proof was upon the petitioner to prove that the alleged misrepresentations by the insured were material to the risk. The jury refused to so find. We agree with the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals that there was evidence to support the answers of the jury. This is determinative of the case; therefore, we do not reach the other points of error urged by the petitioner. We refuse the application for writ of error with the notation “no reversible error.” 396 S.W.2d 207.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Manhattan Life Insurance Co. v. Harkrider, 402 S.W.2d 511, 9 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 341, 1966 Tex. LEXIS 321 (Tex. 1966).
402 S.W.2d 511 (Manhattan Life Insurance Co. v. Harkrider) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Westchester Fire Insurance Co. v. English
543 S.W.2d 407 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Praetorian Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Sherman
455 S.W.2d 201 (Texas Supreme Court, 1970)
Occidental Life Insurance Company of California v. Bob Leroy's Inc.
413 F.2d 819 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of Tenn. v. Rivera
420 S.W.2d 788 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1967)