Manhattan Guide Co. v. Gluck
52 Misc. 652, 101 N.Y.S. 528
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 15, 1906·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Oral evidence, tending to establish an independent collateral agreement as a condition precedent to a contract becoming operative, is not evidence tending to vary or impeach a written instrument; and its exclusion constitutes reversible error. Benton v. Martin, 52 N. Y. 575; Burke v. Delaney, 153 U. S. 228.
Present: Gildersleeve, Fitzgerald and Davis, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Manhattan Guide Co. v. Gluck, 52 Misc. 652, 101 N.Y.S. 528 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).
52 Misc. 652 (Manhattan Guide Co. v. Gluck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Continental Jewelry Co. v. Ingelstrom
252 P. 186 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1926)
Ohl v. Coleman
113 N.Y.S. 492 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)