Manhattan Co. v. Smith
1 Cai. Cas. 67, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 168
This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 67 (Manhattan Co. v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Manhattan Co. v. Smith, 1 Cai. Cas. 67, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 168 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1803).
Opinion
acquiesced, because it had been so decided, but confessed he did not believe the legislature intended the construction put upon the act by the court should ever be given to it. The rigor of the practice was, in, his opinion, enough to condemn it, for he thought the neglect in the plaintiff ought to accrue to the advantage of the prisoner.
Supersedeas refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Watt v. Healy
29 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 491 (New York Supreme Court, 1880)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Cai. Cas. 67, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manhattan-co-v-smith-nysupct-1803.