Manhattan Co. v. Lydig

New York Supreme Court

Manhattan Co. v. Lydig

2 Cai. Cas. 380

DecidedJuly 1, 1805

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Cai. Cas. 380 (Manhattan Co. v. Lydig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manhattan Co. v. Lydig, 2 Cai. Cas. 380 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

In all thefe cafes the court ought to fee, from the facts laid before them, that the caufe is either-intricate or important, and not fubmit themfelves to the .opinion of the attorney. We want fomething beyond his mere aifi-davit. The words of the.flatute require this. If, indeed, there be no oppofition, then the motion pafies, as in other cafes, of courfe ; becaufe the oppofite party by his conduit confefies thefe requifites.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

In all thefe cafes the court ought to fee, from the facts laid before them, that the caufe is either-intricate or important, and not fubmit themfelves to the .opinion of the attorney. We want fomething beyond his mere aifi-davit. The words of the.flatute require this. If, indeed, there be no oppofition, then the motion pafies, as in other cafes, of courfe ; becaufe the oppofite party by his conduit confefies thefe requifites.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Cai. Cas. 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manhattan-co-v-lydig-nysupct-1805.