Mangum v. State

117 So. 926, 22 Ala. App. 681
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 30, 1928
Docket7 Div. 414.
StatusPublished

This text of 117 So. 926 (Mangum v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mangum v. State, 117 So. 926, 22 Ala. App. 681 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

An affidavit charging this appellant with a violation of the prohibition law was made by one Draper before a justice of the peace. A warrant was issued, made returnable' to the county court, where the defendant was tried and convicted, and thereupon appealed to the circuit court. He was again convicted by the court without a jury, fined $100, and in addition thereto imposed 90 days’ hard labor for the *682 county. The clerk of the lower court certifies that no bill of exceptions has been presented, and the appeal is here upon the record proper. The judgment of conviction is affirmed, as there is no error apparent upon the record. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 So. 926, 22 Ala. App. 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mangum-v-state-alactapp-1928.