Mangum Electric Co. v. Russell

Supreme Court

Mangum Electric Co. v. Russell

263 U.S. 675, 44 S. Ct. 4, 68 L. Ed. 501, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2839

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 8, 1923

DocketNo. 23

StatusPublished

This text of 263 U.S. 675 (Mangum Electric Co. v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mangum Electric Co. v. Russell, 263 U.S. 675, 44 S. Ct. 4, 68 L. Ed. 501, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2839 (1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Action below to enjoin utility rates as in violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Rates sustained as reasonable by State Commission, State Supreme Court, and the United States District Court below. Appellees have filed brief. Appellant has failed to do so. The Court declines, in the absence of a brief, to examine a lengthy record to determine whether the evidence contained therein overcomes the presumption attaching to the finding of the commission and two courts, Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Action below to enjoin utility rates as in violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Rates sustained as reasonable by State Commission, State Supreme Court, and the United States District Court below. Appellees have filed brief. Appellant has failed to do so. The Court declines, in the absence of a brief, to examine a lengthy record to determine whether the evidence contained therein overcomes the presumption attaching to the finding of the commission and two courts, Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 U.S. 675, 44 S. Ct. 4, 68 L. Ed. 501, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mangum-electric-co-v-russell-scotus-1923.