Mangrum v. Alabama Commission

531 U.S. 1063, 121 S. Ct. 844
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 8, 2001·No. No. 00-6722·Published

Opinion

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance [1064]*1064with Rule 38.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents.

See id., at 4, and eases cited therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mangrum v. Alabama Commission, 531 U.S. 1063, 121 S. Ct. 844 (2001).

531 U.S. 1063 (Mangrum v. Alabama Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)