Mangrum v. Alabama Commission

531 U.S. 1063, 121 S. Ct. 844
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 8, 2001
DocketNo. 00-6722
StatusPublished

This text of 531 U.S. 1063 (Mangrum v. Alabama Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mangrum v. Alabama Commission, 531 U.S. 1063, 121 S. Ct. 844 (2001).

Opinion

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance [1064]*1064with Rule 38.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents.

See id., at 4, and eases cited therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
531 U.S. 1063, 121 S. Ct. 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mangrum-v-alabama-commission-scotus-2001.