Mangold v. Neuman
87 A.D.2d 780, 449 N.Y.S.2d 232, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16215
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 20, 1982·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinions
Order of Supreme Court, New York County (Ryp, J.), entered August 19, 1981, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion to confirm the referee’s report and granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint upon grounds of lack of in personam jurisdiction of defendant, is affirmed, with costs. The report made by the referee finding that defendant-respondent was not a resident of New York under CPLR 308 (subd 2) was amply supported by the facts in the record. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Silverman and Asch, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mangold v. Neuman, 87 A.D.2d 780, 449 N.Y.S.2d 232, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16215 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).
87 A.D.2d 780 (Mangold v. Neuman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Washington Mutual Bank v. Murphy
127 A.D.3d 1167 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
National Development Co. v. Triad Holding Corp.
930 F.2d 253 (Second Circuit, 1991)
National Development Company v. Triad Holding Corporation
930 F.2d 253 (Second Circuit, 1991)
Palandjian v. Pahlavi
586 F. Supp. 671 (D. Massachusetts, 1984)