Mango v. East Ohio Gas Co.

90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 395
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 10, 1914
DocketNo. 13683
StatusPublished

This text of 90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 395 (Mango v. East Ohio Gas Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mango v. East Ohio Gas Co., 90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 395 (Ohio 1914).

Opinion

Judgment reversed. See journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the [396]*396judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby iSj reversed; and the court coming now to render the judgment that the circuit court should have rendered, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the common pleas court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, reversed for error in directing a verdict for the defendant, and said cause is remanded to the common pleas court for further proceedings and trial according to law.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mango-v-east-ohio-gas-co-ohio-1914.