Mango v. East Ohio Gas Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Mango v. East Ohio Gas Co.

90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 395

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 10, 1914·No. No. 13683·Published

Opinion

Judgment reversed. See journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the [396]*396judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby iSj reversed; and the court coming now to render the judgment that the circuit court should have rendered, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the common pleas court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, reversed for error in directing a verdict for the defendant, and said cause is remanded to the common pleas court for further proceedings and trial according to law.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed. See journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the [396]*396judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby iSj reversed; and the court coming now to render the judgment that the circuit court should have rendered, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the common pleas court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, reversed for error in directing a verdict for the defendant, and said cause is remanded to the common pleas court for further proceedings and trial according to law.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Mango v. East Ohio Gas Co., 90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 395 (Ohio 1914).

Pincite

90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 395 (Mango v. East Ohio Gas Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.