Manglesdorf Seed Co. v. Williams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Manglesdorf Seed Co. v. Williams

1926 OK 527, 247 P. 413, 118 Okla. 258, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 897

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 22, 1926

Docket16713

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1926 OK 527 (Manglesdorf Seed Co. v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manglesdorf Seed Co. v. Williams, 1926 OK 527, 247 P. 413, 118 Okla. 258, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 897 (Okla. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

LOGSDON, O.

There has been filed in this case a written stipulation signed by the attorneys of record for the parties. in which it is agreed that the briefs filed by the respective parties in the case of Manglesdorf Seed Company. Plaintiff in Error, v. Busby. Defendants in Error, No. 16712 (ante, p. 255) shall be considered as the briefs in this ease, and that the decision. judgment, and mandate of this court in cause No. 16712 shall be considered as the decision, judgment, and mandate in this instant cause.

In conformity with the written stipulation of counsel the syllabus and opinion this day filed in the case numbered 16712. Man-glesdorf Seed Go.. Plaintiff in Error, v. E. Busby et al., Defendants in Error, are hereby referred to and adopted as the syllabus and opinion of this court in the instant case.

For the reasons stated in the opinion above referred to. the judgment of the trial court in this instant case is reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to grant plaintiff in error a new trial.

Bv the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

LOGSDON, O.

There has been filed in this case a written stipulation signed by the attorneys of record for the parties. in which it is agreed that the briefs filed by the respective parties in the case of Manglesdorf Seed Company. Plaintiff in Error, v. Busby. Defendants in Error, No. 16712 (ante, p. 255) shall be considered as the briefs in this ease, and that the decision. judgment, and mandate of this court in cause No. 16712 shall be considered as the decision, judgment, and mandate in this instant cause.

In conformity with the written stipulation of counsel the syllabus and opinion this day filed in the case numbered 16712. Man-glesdorf Seed Go.. Plaintiff in Error, v. E. Busby et al., Defendants in Error, are hereby referred to and adopted as the syllabus and opinion of this court in the instant case.

For the reasons stated in the opinion above referred to. the judgment of the trial court in this instant case is reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to grant plaintiff in error a new trial.

Bv the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1926 OK 527, 247 P. 413, 118 Okla. 258, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manglesdorf-seed-co-v-williams-okla-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack