Manglaviti v. Kozakiewicz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Manglaviti v. Kozakiewicz

6 A.D.3d 717, 775 N.Y.S.2d 179

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 26, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 A.D.3d 717 (Manglaviti v. Kozakiewicz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manglaviti v. Kozakiewicz, 6 A.D.3d 717, 775 N.Y.S.2d 179 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78, inter alia, to review Resolution No. 1009 of the Town Board of the Town of Riverhead dated September 18, 2001, which determined that the Riverhead Fire District, which sought to construct a fire training facility, was exempt from certain zoning regulations, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oliver, J.), entered February 3, 2003, which dismissed the proceeding as academic.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed this proceeding as academic. Resolution No. 1009 was rescinded in part and superseded in part by Resolution No. 574, which was passed by the Town Board of the Town of Riverhead on May 21, 2002. H. Miller, J.E, Luciano, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78, inter alia, to review Resolution No. 1009 of the Town Board of the Town of Riverhead dated September 18, 2001, which determined that the Riverhead Fire District, which sought to construct a fire training facility, was exempt from certain zoning regulations, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oliver, J.), entered February 3, 2003, which dismissed the proceeding as academic.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed this proceeding as academic. Resolution No. 1009 was rescinded in part and superseded in part by Resolution No. 574, which was passed by the Town Board of the Town of Riverhead on May 21, 2002. H. Miller, J.E, Luciano, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.3d 717, 775 N.Y.S.2d 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manglaviti-v-kozakiewicz-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack