Mangis v. Jones

Appellate Court of Illinois

Mangis v. Jones

202 Ill. App. 572

DecidedNovember 13, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 202 Ill. App. 572 (Mangis v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mangis v. Jones, 202 Ill. App. 572 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Trespass, § 27*—when reversioner may maintain action for damages for. Where land was in the possession of one as tenant of another who claimed to be the owner thereof by twenty years’ adverse possession under claim of ownership, and a third person built a fence and took possession of the land, claiming ownership thereof through survey and deeds of adjoining land, held that under the Practice Act, sec. 36 (J. & A. If 8573), giving a right of action to one not in possession for injury to a remainder or reversion, the lessor had a right to sue for the damages which accrued to him as reversioner by reason of such injury. 3. Trespass, § 62*—what damages are recoverable by reversioner. Where a person went upon land in possession of the tenant of another, built a fence thereon and took possession thereof, held that the party whose tenant was in possession of the land was entitled to recover at least nominal damages and a judgment for five dollars in his favor was not excessive.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Trespass, § 27*—when reversioner may maintain action for damages for. Where land was in the possession of one as tenant of another who claimed to be the owner thereof by twenty years’ adverse possession under claim of ownership, and a third person built a fence and took possession of the land, claiming ownership thereof through survey and deeds of adjoining land, held that under the Practice Act, sec. 36 (J. & A. If 8573), giving a right of action to one not in possession for injury to a remainder or reversion, the lessor had a right to sue for the damages which accrued to him as reversioner by reason of such injury. 3. Trespass, § 62*—what damages are recoverable by reversioner. Where a person went upon land in possession of the tenant of another, built a fence thereon and took possession thereof, held that the party whose tenant was in possession of the land was entitled to recover at least nominal damages and a judgment for five dollars in his favor was not excessive.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 Ill. App. 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mangis-v-jones-illappct-1916.