Mangiafridda v. Masker Fruit Farms, Inc.

2019 NY Slip Op 25

• Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
• Decided: January 3, 2019
• Docket: 7980 21098/15E
• Status: Published

Opinion

Mangiafridda v Masker Fruit Farms, Inc. (2019 NY Slip Op 00025)

Mangiafridda v Masker Fruit Farms, Inc.

2019 NY Slip Op 00025

Decided on January 3, 2019

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 3, 2019
Friedman, J.P., Richter, Gesmer, Kern, Moulton, JJ.

7980 21098/15E

[*1]Dina Mangiafridda, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v

Masker Fruit Farms, Inc., et al., Defendants-Respondents.

Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for appellants.

Ehrlich Gayner LLP, New York (Charles J. Gayner of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered December 2, 2016, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff alleges that she was injured because of the hazardous nature of the roadway at defendants' apple orchard, which sloped downward and was rocky. However, as the rocky nature of the roadway is an open and obvious condition, inherent in the nature of an apple orchard, which plaintiff should have reasonably anticipated, the court correctly dismissed the complaint. Moreover, defendant had posted signs explicitly

warning guests of the hazards. (Moriello v Stormville Airport Antique Show & Flea Mkt., 271 AD2d 664 [2d Dept 2000]; see also Fox v Central Park Boathouse, LLC 71 AD3d 598 [1st Dept 2010]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JANUARY 3, 2019

CLERK