Mangelsdorf v. Zimmerman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mangelsdorf v. Zimmerman

556 S.W.3d 676

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 25, 2018·No. No. ED 106406·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Thomas K. Mangelsdorf, Arnold J. Levin, and Roslyn J. Levin appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County affirming the order of the State Tax Commission of Missouri, which upheld the decision of the St. Louis County Board of Equalization sustaining the assessments made by Jake Zimmerman, Assessor for St. Louis County, Missouri. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Thomas K. Mangelsdorf, Arnold J. Levin, and Roslyn J. Levin appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County affirming the order of the State Tax Commission of Missouri, which upheld the decision of the St. Louis County Board of Equalization sustaining the assessments made by Jake Zimmerman, Assessor for St. Louis County, Missouri. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Mangelsdorf v. Zimmerman, 556 S.W.3d 676 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

556 S.W.3d 676 (Mangelsdorf v. Zimmerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.