Mangels v. Incorporated Village of Rockville Centre
This text of 270 A.D. 903 (Mangels v. Incorporated Village of Rockville Centre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for a declaratory judgment that a zoning ordinance as it affects plaintiff is void, to restrain his prosecution for alleged violation of the ordinance, etc., order restraining defendant from proceeding in an action in the local police court, pendente lite, reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, without costs. A court of equity may restrain the prosecution of a criminal action in an exceptional case where irreparable injury may result, where the application presents only a question of law, and where a clear legal right to the relief is established. (Reed v. Littleton, 275'N. Y, 150; Mills Novelty Go. v. Sunderman, 266 N. Y. 32.) Such [904]*904requirements are not satisfied by the showing in this case. Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Aldrich and Nolan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 A.D. 903, 61 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mangels-v-incorporated-village-of-rockville-centre-nyappdiv-1946.