Mangar v. Parkash 180 LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mangar v. Parkash 180 LLC

99 A.D.3d 607, 952 N.Y.2d 446

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 23, 2012

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 99 A.D.3d 607 (Mangar v. Parkash 180 LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mangar v. Parkash 180 LLC, 99 A.D.3d 607, 952 N.Y.2d 446 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendants established that the half-inch height differential at the top of a two-step exterior stairway was trivial and nonactionable (see Trincere v County of Suffolk, 90 NY2d 976, 977 [1997]; Morales v Riverbay Corp., 226 AD2d 271 [1st Dept 1996]). In opposition, plaintiff, who had walked on the steps twice daily for years without incident, failed to raise a triable is[608]*608sue of fact. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, DeGrasse and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendants established that the half-inch height differential at the top of a two-step exterior stairway was trivial and nonactionable (see Trincere v County of Suffolk, 90 NY2d 976, 977 [1997]; Morales v Riverbay Corp., 226 AD2d 271 [1st Dept 1996]). In opposition, plaintiff, who had walked on the steps twice daily for years without incident, failed to raise a triable is[608]*608sue of fact. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, DeGrasse and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.D.3d 607, 952 N.Y.2d 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mangar-v-parkash-180-llc-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack