Mangar v. Parkash 180 LLC
99 A.D.3d 607, 952 N.Y.2d 446
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 23, 2012·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Defendants established that the half-inch height differential at the top of a two-step exterior stairway was trivial and nonactionable (see Trincere v County of Suffolk, 90 NY2d 976, 977 [1997]; Morales v Riverbay Corp., 226 AD2d 271 [1st Dept 1996]). In opposition, plaintiff, who had walked on the steps twice daily for years without incident, failed to raise a triable is[608]*608sue of fact. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, DeGrasse and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mangar v. Parkash 180 LLC, 99 A.D.3d 607, 952 N.Y.2d 446 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
99 A.D.3d 607 (Mangar v. Parkash 180 LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hutchinson v. Sheridan Hill House Corp.
110 A.D.3d 552 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)