Manganelli v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Manganelli v. State

582 So. 2d 826, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7609, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1921

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 26, 1991·No. No. 91-00038·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence, but remand for the trial court to conform the written sentence to its oral pronouncement that the appellant serve 364 days in the county jail as a special condition of probation. The written sentence erroneously reflects that the appellant serve 364 days followed by five years on probation. The appellant need not be present for this purpose. Esposito v. State, 424 So.2d 160 (Fla.2d DCA 1982).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence, but remand for the trial court to conform the written sentence to its oral pronouncement that the appellant serve 364 days in the county jail as a special condition of probation. The written sentence erroneously reflects that the appellant serve 364 days followed by five years on probation. The appellant need not be present for this purpose. Esposito v. State, 424 So.2d 160 (Fla.2d DCA 1982).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.

Manganelli v. State, 582 So. 2d 826, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7609, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1921 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

582 So. 2d 826 (Manganelli v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related