Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Manganelli v. State

Manganelli v. State

582 So. 2d 826, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7609, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1921
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 26, 1991
DocketNo. 91-00038
StatusPublished

This text of 582 So. 2d 826 (Manganelli v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manganelli v. State, 582 So. 2d 826, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7609, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1921 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence, but remand for the trial court to conform the written sentence to its oral pronouncement that the appellant serve 364 days in the county jail as a special condition of probation. The written sentence erroneously reflects that the appellant serve 364 days followed by five years on probation. The appellant need not be present for this purpose. Esposito v. State, 424 So.2d 160 (Fla.2d DCA 1982).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Esposito v. State
424 So. 2d 160 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
582 So. 2d 826, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7609, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manganelli-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.