Mangam v. State

324 So. 2d 672, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 19080
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 31, 1975
DocketNo. 75-4
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 324 So. 2d 672 (Mangam v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mangam v. State, 324 So. 2d 672, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 19080 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from the revocation of his probation.

It is manifest from the colloquy that the trial court, in effect, ruled that appellant did not have Fifth Amendment constitutional rights and penalized him for refusing to testify.

We reverse upon authority of Heath v. State, 310 So.2d 38 (Fla.App. 4th, 1975), and remand for a new hearing.

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN, C. J., and OWEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Mangam
343 So. 2d 599 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
324 So. 2d 672, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 19080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mangam-v-state-fladistctapp-1975.