Mangam v. State
324 So. 2d 672, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 19080
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 31, 1975·No. No. 75-4·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant appeals from the revocation of his probation.
It is manifest from the colloquy that the trial court, in effect, ruled that appellant did not have Fifth Amendment constitutional rights and penalized him for refusing to testify.
We reverse upon authority of Heath v. State, 310 So.2d 38 (Fla.App. 4th, 1975), and remand for a new hearing.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mangam v. State, 324 So. 2d 672, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 19080 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).
324 So. 2d 672 (Mangam v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Mangam
343 So. 2d 599 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)