Manfredonia v. Rejean Designs of Palm Beach, Inc.

637 So. 2d 375, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5651, 1994 WL 241745
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 7, 1994·No. No. 93-1882·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission denying Appellant unemployment benefits. The record contains competent and substantial evidence to support the commission’s findings. See Glover v. Sanford Child Care, Inc., 429 So.2d 91 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Florida Industrial Commission v. Nordin, 101 So.2d 890 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958). Moreover, the facts of this case support the commission’s conclusion that Appellant was discharged for misconduct connected with his work. See Orange Bank v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 611 So.2d 107 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), rev. denied sub nom. Sloan v. Orange Bank, 621 So.2d 1066 (Fla.1993).

AFFIRMED.

ZEHMER, C.J., and MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manfredonia v. Rejean Designs of Palm Beach, Inc., 637 So. 2d 375, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5651, 1994 WL 241745 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

637 So. 2d 375 (Manfredonia v. Rejean Designs of Palm Beach, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glover v. Sanford Child Care, Inc.
429 So. 2d 91 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Florida Industrial Commission v. Nordin
101 So. 2d 890 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Orange Bank v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N
611 So. 2d 107 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)