Manfra v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Manfra v. City of New York

6 A.D.2d 817, 175 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5563

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.2d 817 (Manfra v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manfra v. City of New York, 6 A.D.2d 817, 175 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5563 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for alleged wrongful death, the appeal is (1) from an order dated June 6, 1957 which, inter alia, stayed further examination before trial of a named witness and directed that the additional examination of this witness (meaning what took place at the attempted examination before an Official Referee) is not to be used as testimony in the case, and (2) from so much of an order dated October 7, 1957 granting appellant’s motion for reargument as adhered to the original decision. Order dated October 7, 1957 insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from order dated June 6, 1957 dismissed, without costs. By appealing from the order dated October 7, 1957 appellant waived the right to prosecute the appeal from the order dated June 6, 1957 (Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz, 6 A D 2d 812). Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for alleged wrongful death, the appeal is (1) from an order dated June 6, 1957 which, inter alia, stayed further examination before trial of a named witness and directed that the additional examination of this witness (meaning what took place at the attempted examination before an Official Referee) is not to be used as testimony in the case, and (2) from so much of an order dated October 7, 1957 granting appellant’s motion for reargument as adhered to the original decision. Order dated October 7, 1957 insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from order dated June 6, 1957 dismissed, without costs. By appealing from the order dated October 7, 1957 appellant waived the right to prosecute the appeal from the order dated June 6, 1957 (Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz, 6 A D 2d 812). Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.2d 817, 175 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manfra-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1958.