Manevich & Vesely, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Manevich & Vesely, Inc. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 347

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 3, 1957

DocketNo. 60998; protests 92411-K, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 39 Cust. Ct. 347 (Manevich & Vesely, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manevich & Vesely, Inc. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 347 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

Opinions

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of kidskin or lambskin plates similar in all material respects to those the subject of Prime Fur Corp. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and that the items marked “B” consist of goatskins similar to those involved in United States v. Winograd Bros., Inc. (32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of kidskin or lambskin plates similar in all material respects to those the subject of Prime Fur Corp. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and that the items marked “B” consist of goatskins similar to those involved in United States v. Winograd Bros., Inc. (32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 Cust. Ct. 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manevich-vesely-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1957.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack