Maness v. Wainwright
430 U.S. 927, 97 S. Ct. 1545
This text of 430 U.S. 927 (Maness v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Maness v. Wainwright, 430 U.S. 927, 97 S. Ct. 1545 (1977).
Opinion
C. A. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 429 U. S. 893.] Motion of George R. Georgieff, Esquire, to permit Arthur Joel Berger, Esquire, to argue pro hac vice on behalf of respondent granted. Motion of petitioner for additional time for oral argument, or in the alternative for divided argument, denied. Motion to strike portions of respondent’s brief denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
430 U.S. 927, 97 S. Ct. 1545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maness-v-wainwright-scotus-1977.