Maness v. Maness
This text of 213 S.W.3d 703 (Maness v. Maness) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Marjorie Maness (Plaintiff) appeals from the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, dismissing with prejudice her claims of personal injury and damages against James W. Maness (Defendant). Plaintiffs petition alleged childhood sexual battery and incestuous abuse, intentional infliction of emotional distress and sought punitive damages. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
213 S.W.3d 703, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 202, 2007 WL 329089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maness-v-maness-moctapp-2007.