Maneros v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Maneros v. State

1936 OK CR 42, 56 P.2d 422, 59 Okla. Crim. 76, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 9

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 3, 1936

DocketNo. A-9020.

StatusPublished

This text of 1936 OK CR 42 (Maneros v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maneros v. State, 1936 OK CR 42, 56 P.2d 422, 59 Okla. Crim. 76, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 9 (Okla. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the court of common pleas, Oklahoma county, of maintaining a place where intoxicating liquors were sold, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $75 and to serve a term of 30 days in the county jail. The evidence is that defendant had a place of business on North Fiftieth street known as “Al & Tony’s Nite Club.” It had the reputation of being a place where intoxicating liquor was sold. Certain officers sent an informer into the place with some marked money to' buy whisky. He bought it and returned, and the officers then arrested defendant and found the marked money on his person, and he admitted to them he sold the whisky to the informer and also delivered to them other whisky which he had there. Defendant did not take the stand and offered no testimony. There is no merit in the appeal.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the court of common pleas, Oklahoma county, of maintaining a place where intoxicating liquors were sold, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $75 and to serve a term of 30 days in the county jail. The evidence is that defendant had a place of business on North Fiftieth street known as “Al & Tony’s Nite Club.” It had the reputation of being a place where intoxicating liquor was sold. Certain officers sent an informer into the place with some marked money to' buy whisky. He bought it and returned, and the officers then arrested defendant and found the marked money on his person, and he admitted to them he sold the whisky to the informer and also delivered to them other whisky which he had there. Defendant did not take the stand and offered no testimony. There is no merit in the appeal.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1936 OK CR 42, 56 P.2d 422, 59 Okla. Crim. 76, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maneros-v-state-oklacrimapp-1936.