Manente v. Sorecon Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Manente v. Sorecon Corp.

18 A.D.2d 922, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4407

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 11, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 922 (Manente v. Sorecon Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manente v. Sorecon Corp., 18 A.D.2d 922, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4407 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recovel- damages for personal injury sustained by the original plaintiff, Nicola Manente, who died during the pendency of this appeal, apparently from a cause not connected with such injury, defendant Soreeon Corporation appeals from, a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmont County, entered November 17j 1961 after trial upon a jury’s verdict, in favor of said original plaintiff. (For prior appeal in this action, see 14 A D 2d 806; for related appeal, see 14 A D 2d 972.) Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. In our opinion, the verdict was against the weight of th'e credible evidence. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recovel- damages for personal injury sustained by the original plaintiff, Nicola Manente, who died during the pendency of this appeal, apparently from a cause not connected with such injury, defendant Soreeon Corporation appeals from, a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmont County, entered November 17j 1961 after trial upon a jury’s verdict, in favor of said original plaintiff. (For prior appeal in this action, see 14 A D 2d 806; for related appeal, see 14 A D 2d 972.) Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. In our opinion, the verdict was against the weight of th'e credible evidence. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 922, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manente-v-sorecon-corp-nyappdiv-1963.