Manelas v. National Accident & Health Insurance

2 A.2d 310, 89 N.H. 559, 1938 N.H. LEXIS 80
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided November 1, 1938·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff cannot recover if the falsity of his statement “affected either the acceptance of the risk or the hazard assumed by the insurer.” P. L., c. 281, s. 15. In this jurisdiction a false statement as to medical history is held to affect the acceptance of the risk as a matter of law. Amoskeag Trust Co. v. Insurance Co., 88 N. H. 154, 163.

Judgment for the defendant.

Branch, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manelas v. National Accident & Health Insurance, 2 A.2d 310, 89 N.H. 559, 1938 N.H. LEXIS 80 (N.H. 1938).

2 A.2d 310 (Manelas v. National Accident & Health Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warren Wallis v. HCC Life Ins. Co.
2017 DNH 039 (D. New Hampshire, 2017)
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Allen
1965 OK 203 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1965)
Campbell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
155 N.E.2d 9 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1958)