Home/New York Court of Appeals/Maneiro v. Northrup

Maneiro v. Northrup

318 N.E.2d 600, 34 N.Y.2d 963, 360 N.Y.S.2d 407, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1360
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 28, 1974
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 318 N.E.2d 600 (Maneiro v. Northrup) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maneiro v. Northrup, 318 N.E.2d 600, 34 N.Y.2d 963, 360 N.Y.S.2d 407, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1360 (N.Y. 1974).

Opinion

In each proceeding: Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: Section 145 of the Election Law requires, inter alia, that specifications of the grounds of the objections to any petition or certificate of designation or nomination be filed within six days after general objections have been filed. In this case the Appellate Division found that the specific objections were not filed within the prescribed time limit. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed solely on the basis of that factual determination, it not being necessary to reach the alternative rationale in the memorandum of the Appellate Division.

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Rabin and Staley.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McGoey v. Black
123 Misc. 2d 508 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)
MATTER OF BUSH v. Salerno
412 N.E.2d 366 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
318 N.E.2d 600, 34 N.Y.2d 963, 360 N.Y.S.2d 407, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maneiro-v-northrup-ny-1974.