Mandula v. Korrol Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Mandula v. Korrol Manufacturing Co.

180 Misc. 378, 42 N.Y.S.2d 555

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 25, 1943

StatusPublished

This text of 180 Misc. 378 (Mandula v. Korrol Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mandula v. Korrol Manufacturing Co., 180 Misc. 378, 42 N.Y.S.2d 555 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is -against the overwhelming weight of the credible evidence, oral as well as documentary. The defendant, therefore, is not only entitled to a reversal of the judgment but also to restitution of the sum of $293.23 which represents the judgment obtained by plaintiff in this action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment is -against the overwhelming weight of the credible evidence, oral as well as documentary. The defendant, therefore, is not only entitled to a reversal of the judgment but also to restitution of the sum of $293.23 which represents the judgment obtained by plaintiff in this action.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 Misc. 378, 42 N.Y.S.2d 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mandula-v-korrol-manufacturing-co-nyappterm-1943.