Mandry v. Brown Cracker & Candy Co.

248 S.W. 1095
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 21, 1923·No. No. 6896.·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

COBBS, J.

The transcript in this ease was filed on the 17th day of July, 1922. The case was set down in its regular order for submission on the 14th day of February, 1923. Appellants filed their brief on the 12th day of February, 1923. two days before its submission. Appellee filed no brief, but filed a written motion on the 10th day of February, 1923, two days previous to the time when the appellants filed their brief to dismiss the appeal. Appellants filed no reply to the motion, and it comes before us solely on the motion to dismiss the appeal which violates the practice in such cases prescribed by article 2115, R. S., and rules 38, 40 (230 S. W. viii) and 102 of the Texas court rules prepared by the Supreme Court for the preparation of cases on appeal. These rules have been violated in preparing this case for appeal, and the appellee is clearly within its legal rights in presenting this motion. Weston v. Patterson (Tex. Civ. App.) 165 S. W. 1195, opinion by Justice Moursund. Attorneys should do well to bear this case in mind when filing transcripts.

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mandry v. Brown Cracker & Candy Co., 248 S.W. 1095 (Tex. Ct. App. 1923).

248 S.W. 1095 (Mandry v. Brown Cracker & Candy Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lueck v. Carter
466 S.W.2d 90 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Hinckley-Tandy Leather Co. v. Hazlewood
45 S.W.2d 1103 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Dean v. Orton
293 S.W. 703 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Hoya v. Bates
280 S.W. 916 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Guaranty State Bank of Ranger v. Megede
251 S.W. 1119 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Prairie Oil &. Gas Co. v. Curry
251 S.W. 559 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1923)