Mandis Dairy, Inc. v. Shepardson

Supreme Court of Florida

Mandis Dairy, Inc. v. Shepardson

156 So. 523, 116 Fla. 557, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1102

DecidedSeptember 20, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 156 So. 523 (Mandis Dairy, Inc. v. Shepardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mandis Dairy, Inc. v. Shepardson, 156 So. 523, 116 Fla. 557, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1102 (Fla. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

*558 Per Curiam.

The appeal before us is from final decree and also from an interlocutory order denying a motion to vacate decree pro, confesso and to allow an answer to be filed.

An examination of the answer offered to be filed shows that it was insufficient in its allegations to set up any defense against the foreclosure suit. The record shows that the decree pro confesso was duly entered by the court for failure to file pleadings as required under the provisions of the 1931 Chancery Practice Act.

We find no reversible error in the order or decree complained of and, therefore, the same should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI