Mandeville v. Rumney
3 D.C. 424
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedApril 15, 1829
StatusPublished
This text of 3 D.C. 424 (Mandeville v. Rumney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mandeville v. Rumney, 3 D.C. 424 (circtddc 1829).
Opinion
The Couet, (Morsell, J. doubting,) was of opinion, that it was not. See Story’s Chitty on Bills, and the cases cited there in the notes.
The Court was of the same opinion, in the action of the same plaintiff against Runels, the indorser of the same note.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 D.C. 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mandeville-v-rumney-circtddc-1829.