Mandeville v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mandeville v. Director of Revenue

870 S.W.2d 479, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 285, 1994 WL 50134

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 22, 1994·No. No. 64098·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Director of Revenue appeals an order denying her motion to set aside a default judgment. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Director of Revenue appeals an order denying her motion to set aside a default judgment. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Mandeville v. Director of Revenue, 870 S.W.2d 479, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 285, 1994 WL 50134 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

870 S.W.2d 479 (Mandeville v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.