Mandeville & Jamesson v. Wilson

Supreme Court

Mandeville & Jamesson v. Wilson

9 U.S. 15

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 15, 1809·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Marshall, Ch. J.

delivered the opinion of the court,

That the exception in the statute applied to actions of assumpsit, as well as to actions of account. That it extended to all accounts current which concern the trade of merchandise between merchant an,d merchant. That an account closed by,,the cessation of dealings between the ’ parties is not an account [19]*19stated, and that it is not necessary that any of the items should come within the five years. That the replication was good, and npt repugnant to the declaration ; and that the rejoinder was bad.

Judgment affirmed with costs.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall, Ch. J.

delivered the opinion of the court,

That the exception in the statute applied to actions of assumpsit, as well as to actions of account. That it extended to all accounts current which concern the trade of merchandise between merchant an,d merchant. That an account closed by,,the cessation of dealings between the ’ parties is not an account [19]*19stated, and that it is not necessary that any of the items should come within the five years. That the replication was good, and npt repugnant to the declaration ; and that the rejoinder was bad.

Judgment affirmed with costs.'

Mandeville & Jamesson v. Wilson, 9 U.S. 15 (1809).

Pincite

9 U.S. 15 (Mandeville & Jamesson v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related