Mandeville Ice & Light Co. v. Town of Mandeville

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Mandeville Ice & Light Co. v. Town of Mandeville

71 So. 512, 139 La. 286, 1916 La. LEXIS 1790

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 3, 1916

DocketNo. 21643

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 71 So. 512 (Mandeville Ice & Light Co. v. Town of Mandeville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mandeville Ice & Light Co. v. Town of Mandeville, 71 So. 512, 139 La. 286, 1916 La. LEXIS 1790 (La. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

PROYOSTY, J.

The St. Tammany & New Orleans Railway & Ferry Company was proceeding to erect electric light poles in the streets of the defendant town, under an ordinance authorizing it to do so, when the present suit was brought, enjoining the further prosecution of the work.

The sole ground of injunction alleged in the petition is that, as an effect of Act 76, p. 194, of 1914,' towns can grant such a use of the streets only with the consent of the taxpayers of the town, obtained at an election held for that purpose.

Authority to grant such use of streets is conferred upon towns by paragraph 7 of Act 111, p. 128, of 1912, without anything being said about consent of taxpayers. But this restriction upon the authority of the town is imposed, says counsel, by the said act of 1914. The act reads:

“Towns * * * shall have authority to grant to railroads and other corporations the right to use and occupy the streets and alleys therein" and to obstruct same, or part thereof, with buildings necessary to and used by said corporations,” provided the consent of the taxpayers is obtained.

The act contains no repealing clause. Evidently its object was to enlarge, not to restrict, the powers of towns. Evidently, also, it has reference to unusual and serious obstructions, such as buildings, and not to the customary ones of poles for stringing wires, pipes for conducting gas and water, and rails for operating cars. The idea that a town should have to consult the taxpayers by means of an expensive election preliminarily to allowing electric light poles, or gas or water pipes, or railway tracks to be laid in a street, were it even for one single block, is evidently foreign entirely to the purpose and intendment of this act.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PROYOSTY, J.

The St. Tammany & New Orleans Railway & Ferry Company was proceeding to erect electric light poles in the streets of the defendant town, under an ordinance authorizing it to do so, when the present suit was brought, enjoining the further prosecution of the work.

The sole ground of injunction alleged in the petition is that, as an effect of Act 76, p. 194, of 1914,' towns can grant such a use of the streets only with the consent of the taxpayers of the town, obtained at an election held for that purpose.

Authority to grant such use of streets is conferred upon towns by paragraph 7 of Act 111, p. 128, of 1912, without anything being said about consent of taxpayers. But this restriction upon the authority of the town is imposed, says counsel, by the said act of 1914. The act reads:

“Towns * * * shall have authority to grant to railroads and other corporations the right to use and occupy the streets and alleys therein" and to obstruct same, or part thereof, with buildings necessary to and used by said corporations,” provided the consent of the taxpayers is obtained.

The act contains no repealing clause. Evidently its object was to enlarge, not to restrict, the powers of towns. Evidently, also, it has reference to unusual and serious obstructions, such as buildings, and not to the customary ones of poles for stringing wires, pipes for conducting gas and water, and rails for operating cars. The idea that a town should have to consult the taxpayers by means of an expensive election preliminarily to allowing electric light poles, or gas or water pipes, or railway tracks to be laid in a street, were it even for one single block, is evidently foreign entirely to the purpose and intendment of this act.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 So. 512, 139 La. 286, 1916 La. LEXIS 1790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mandeville-ice-light-co-v-town-of-mandeville-la-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack