Mandes v. Lee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mandes v. Lee

278 A.D.2d 458, 717 N.Y.S.2d 923, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13925

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 26, 2000·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant appeals from an order of the [459] Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated October 19, 1999, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based on the plaintiffs alleged spoliation of evidence was properly denied (see, Ahmad v Babylon Ford, 276 AD2d 513; McKain v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 274 AD2d 504; DiDomenico v C & S Aeromatik Supplies, 252 AD2d 41).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Altman, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant appeals from an order of the [459] Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated October 19, 1999, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based on the plaintiffs alleged spoliation of evidence was properly denied (see, Ahmad v Babylon Ford, 276 AD2d 513; McKain v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 274 AD2d 504; DiDomenico v C & S Aeromatik Supplies, 252 AD2d 41).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Altman, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

Mandes v. Lee, 278 A.D.2d 458, 717 N.Y.S.2d 923, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

278 A.D.2d 458 (Mandes v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related