Mander v. Concreform Co.

212 So. 2d 631, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2173
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 26, 1968·No. No. 37158·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review on conflict cer-tiorari a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, in Mander v. Concreform Company, Inc., 206 So.2d 662. This case presents the same issue which was decided in Stone v. Jeffres, Fla., 208 So.2d 827, wherein we held attorneys’ fees bear interest from the date of the award thereof by a Deputy Commissioner of the Florida Industrial Commission, unless the award is reversed on review or appeal.

Accordingly, the decision below is quashed and the cause remanded for entry of a judgment in accordance herewith.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., and SPECTOR, District Court Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mander v. Concreform Co., 212 So. 2d 631, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2173 (Fla. 1968).

212 So. 2d 631 (Mander v. Concreform Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wells Fargo Armored Services v. Lee
692 So. 2d 284 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Metropolitan Dade County v. Rolle
678 So. 2d 904 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Thompson v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services
618 So. 2d 333 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Pinellas County School Board v. Rapson
401 So. 2d 907 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Okaloosa County Gas Dist. v. Mandel
394 So. 2d 453 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)