Mandell v. Zaccaria

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mandell v. Zaccaria

248 A.D.2d 362, 669 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2044

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 2, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D.2d 362 (Mandell v. Zaccaria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mandell v. Zaccaria, 248 A.D.2d 362, 669 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2044 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated December 31, 1996, which granted the motion of the plaintiff Ronnie Mandell for summary judgment dismissing his counterclaim insofar as asserted against her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There is no evidence in the record upon which a trier of fact could conclude that the respondent was negligent in the operation of her vehicle. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the respondent’s motion for summary judgment. Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated December 31, 1996, which granted the motion of the plaintiff Ronnie Mandell for summary judgment dismissing his counterclaim insofar as asserted against her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There is no evidence in the record upon which a trier of fact could conclude that the respondent was negligent in the operation of her vehicle. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the respondent’s motion for summary judgment. Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D.2d 362, 669 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mandell-v-zaccaria-nyappdiv-1998.