Mandell v. Purcell

54 A.D.2d 935, 388 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14798
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 8, 1976·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review respondents’ determination, dated October 14, 1975 and made after a hearing, granting a special exception permit to the Hewlett House of Tires Corp., petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 2, 1976, which dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, with costs. The function of a court in reviewing the determination of an administrative body is limited to the question of whether the conclusion arrived at by that body has any reasonable basis in fact, based upon the record before it. We perceive nothing in the record on this appeal to warrant a disturbance of the conclusion of the respondent town board. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Damiani, Rabin, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mandell v. Purcell, 54 A.D.2d 935, 388 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

54 A.D.2d 935 (Mandell v. Purcell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bella Vista Apartment Co. v. Bennett
154 Misc. 2d 579 (New York Supreme Court, 1992)
Cellular Telephone Co. v. Rosenberg
153 Misc. 2d 302 (New York Supreme Court, 1992)
C.C.L.S., Inc. v. Baruch
79 A.D.2d 1002 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Federation of New York State Rifle & Pistol Clubs, Inc. v. McGuire
101 Misc. 2d 104 (New York Supreme Court, 1979)