Mandell v. Grosfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mandell v. Grosfeld

54 A.D.2d 663, 387 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14195

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 A.D.2d 663 (Mandell v. Grosfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mandell v. Grosfeld, 54 A.D.2d 663, 387 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14195 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on June 23, 1975, dismissing the complaint herein, after trial before Schwartz, J., and a jury, unanimously affirmed. Respondents shall recover of appellant $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Plaintiff failed to establish fraud in the sale by him of a purchase money second mortgage to defendant, Grosfeld’s nominee for approximately two thirds of the face value thereof. The portion of the proceeds received from the city which was allocated to satisfy the subject mortgage was nothing more than a rehabilitation loan from the city, which was to be repaid. We have examined the several contentions urged by plaintiff hereon and find them to be without merit. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Silverman, Capozzoli, Nunez and Yesawich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on June 23, 1975, dismissing the complaint herein, after trial before Schwartz, J., and a jury, unanimously affirmed. Respondents shall recover of appellant $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Plaintiff failed to establish fraud in the sale by him of a purchase money second mortgage to defendant, Grosfeld’s nominee for approximately two thirds of the face value thereof. The portion of the proceeds received from the city which was allocated to satisfy the subject mortgage was nothing more than a rehabilitation loan from the city, which was to be repaid. We have examined the several contentions urged by plaintiff hereon and find them to be without merit. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Silverman, Capozzoli, Nunez and Yesawich, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 663, 387 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mandell-v-grosfeld-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack