Mandelbaum v. Silberfeld
This text of 186 Misc. 244 (Mandelbaum v. Silberfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant made a motion in the action for reargument of defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. When it came on for hearing, the motion and action were settled, the latter for $1,500. A written stipulation entitled in the action provided for the settlement, and the manner and time of payment in three equal amounts, the execution of a general release, to be held, pending payment, by plaintiff’s attorneys, that a judgment previously entered for $2,278.90 would stand as security for the payment of the $1,500, and the motion be deemed withdrawn. We deem these facts as bringing the matter within the rule of Goldstein v. Goldsmith (243 App. Div. 268) and not that of Yonkers Fur Dressing Co. v. Royal Ins. Co. (247 N. Y. 435). As nontimely payment of the last installment was the only objection made in rejecting receipt thereof, we also rule that such others as were presented in opposition to this motion below to require acceptance were waived.
•Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Hammer, McLaughlin and Eder, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 Misc. 244, 60 N.Y.S.2d 130, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mandelbaum-v-silberfeld-nyappterm-1946.