Mandelbaum v. Mandelbaum

884 N.E.2d 65, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1455
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 9, 2008·No. 2008-0375·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Montgomery App. No. 21817, 2007-0hio-6138. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 6 of the court of appeals’ Decision and Entry filed January 29, 2008:

“May a trial court modify spousal support under R.C. 3105.18 without finding that: (1) a substantial change in circumstances has occurred; and (2) the change was not contemplated at the time of the original decree?”

The conflict cases are Kingsolver v. Kingsolver, Summit App. No. 21773, 2004-Ohio-3844, Buchal v. Buchal, Lake App. No. 2005-L-095, 2006-Ohio-3879, and Tsai v. Tien, 162 Ohio App.3d 89, 2005-Ohio-3520, 832 N.E.2d 809.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2007-2422, Mandelbaum v. Mandelbaum, Montgomery App. No. 21817, 2007-Ohio-6138.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mandelbaum v. Mandelbaum, 884 N.E.2d 65, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1455 (Ohio 2008).

884 N.E.2d 65 (Mandelbaum v. Mandelbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mandelbaum v. Mandelbaum
2009 Ohio 1222 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)