Mandelbaum v. Mandelbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mandelbaum v. Mandelbaum

42 A.D.2d 531, 344 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4181

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 12, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 42 A.D.2d 531 (Mandelbaum v. Mandelbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mandelbaum v. Mandelbaum, 42 A.D.2d 531, 344 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4181 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on March 13, 1973, which denied, in part, a motion to vacate the demand for a bill of particulars, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on March 13, 1973, denying the motion to [532]*532vacate a demand for the post-office address and residence of the plaintiff, unanimously reversed, on the law and the fact's and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements, and the motion to vacate is granted. In this matrimonial action, it is alleged by the plaintiff and unrefuted by the defendant that there has been a history of harassment, threats and criminal proceedings between the parties. In view of this background and absent a showing by the defendant of a compelling need, disclosure of the plaintiff’s address is unwarranted. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Nunez, Lane, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on March 13, 1973, which denied, in part, a motion to vacate the demand for a bill of particulars, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on March 13, 1973, denying the motion to [532]*532vacate a demand for the post-office address and residence of the plaintiff, unanimously reversed, on the law and the fact's and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements, and the motion to vacate is granted. In this matrimonial action, it is alleged by the plaintiff and unrefuted by the defendant that there has been a history of harassment, threats and criminal proceedings between the parties. In view of this background and absent a showing by the defendant of a compelling need, disclosure of the plaintiff’s address is unwarranted. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Nunez, Lane, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 531, 344 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mandelbaum-v-mandelbaum-nyappdiv-1973.