Mandel v. Mandel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mandel v. Mandel

34 A.D.2d 827, 313 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4706

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 25, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.2d 827 (Mandel v. Mandel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mandel v. Mandel, 34 A.D.2d 827, 313 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4706 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for separation or, in the -alternative, for divorce, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings [828]*828County, dated December 17, 1969, as directed him to pay $200 a week for temporary alimony and child support. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by striking from the second and fourth decretal paragraphs thereof the figure “ $200.00 ” and substituting therefor the figure “ $150.00 ”. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. Under all the circumstances, so far as the facts can be determined from the affidavits, it is our opinion that the award was excessive to the extent indicated. In view of the numerous adjournments heretofore had in this ease, the ease should be brought to trial without further unnecessary delay. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for separation or, in the -alternative, for divorce, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings [828]*828County, dated December 17, 1969, as directed him to pay $200 a week for temporary alimony and child support. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by striking from the second and fourth decretal paragraphs thereof the figure “ $200.00 ” and substituting therefor the figure “ $150.00 ”. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. Under all the circumstances, so far as the facts can be determined from the affidavits, it is our opinion that the award was excessive to the extent indicated. In view of the numerous adjournments heretofore had in this ease, the ease should be brought to trial without further unnecessary delay. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 827, 313 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mandel-v-mandel-nyappdiv-1970.