Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Mandel v. Johnson

Mandel v. Johnson

285 A.D.2d 630, 728 N.Y.S.2d 669, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7682
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 30, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 285 A.D.2d 630 (Mandel v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mandel v. Johnson, 285 A.D.2d 630, 728 N.Y.S.2d 669, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to re[631]*631cover damages for assault, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (De Maro, J.), entered March 22, 2000, which denied his motion to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion to restore the action to the trial calendar, since he failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his delay (see, CPLR 3404; Furniture Vil. v Schoenberger, 283 AD2d 607; Lopez v Imperial Delivery Serv., 282 AD2d 190). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shah v. Carlton Gardens Housing Co.
286 A.D.2d 432 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
285 A.D.2d 630, 728 N.Y.S.2d 669, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mandel-v-johnson-nyappdiv-2001.